 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Interview with Garnik Asatrian
OK: You are very prolific, it is said, in the study of the Yezidi as a separate ethnic and national identity. It is also said that the debate over the Yezidi ethnic identity is a political one. GA: The Kurdish-Yezidi problem over recent years has acquired a political connotation, not only in Armenia but amongst the widespread Kurdish diaspora. Some Kurds think that the problem is initiated by the Armenians. That it is not right, that it is not true, because Armenians have no interest in this problem. Whether they are Kurds or Yezidi doesn't matter for us, or for the national interests of Armenia. As you know the Yezidi problem always existed from the beginning of this ethno-confessional group - from the early 16th century onwards - because the formation of a Yezidi religion, a Yezid confession, a Yezidi ethnic group can be dated from the 13th century. The Yezidi can be originated from the 13th century. So, the Yezidis have always been the subject of persecution on behalf of the Kurds first of all, and they have a deep hatred towards the Kurds. Although they speak Kurdish - Kurmanji - they do not consider themselves as Kurds, so this is the problem. During the Soviet period, during the process of the unification of all nations, of course Yezidi were considered as Kurds. The Yezidi clergy was persecuted by the state, not the Armenian state but the Soviet state, as the bearers of religious tradition. Most of them were shot, and those that survived were placed in Stalin's camps. So, in 1988 during the resurrection of Armenia, it was also very natural that the Yezidi regained their national identity, and their religion. This was the main reason for the emergence of the Yezidi movement, not because of the Armenian Government or Government officials.
OK: But there are Yezidi who consider themselves Yezidi-Kurd and accuse the Armenian Government of trying to promote a separate Yezidi identity. GA: Yes, some. Among the Yezidi there are those that do have Kurdish ties, but not all Yezidi. To be part of the Yezidi or Kurdish nation is just as much part of an individual's personal ambition. So, it is very natural for some Yezidi, but I am talking about the Yezidi as a whole, and not some individuals, for example Karlene Chachani.
OK: I met with a Yezidi family yesterday that bear out much of what you say, but there are still some confusing contradictions. For example, although you say that Yezidi are not Kurds, many Yezidi in Armenia, and despite the expulsion of most of Armenia's Moslem Kurds, consider "Riya Taza", a Kurdish newspaper with a Yezidi editor, their newspaper. Also, Kurdish academics have suggested that there is an Armenian nationalist movement that has attempted to supress the Yezidi Kurdish identity - for example, Mehrdad Izady in "Kurdish Life" has accused some Armenian nationalist newspapers of printing racist articles regarding the Kurds and the Yezidi-Kurdish identity. GA: Mehrdad Izady is a stupid man, a very stupid man. He is a Professor at the University of Harvard, and I wonder why Harvard has Professors such as he. For example, he could not even be a mere teacher here in Armenia, even teaching children. It's amazing, it's amazing, it's very amazing.
OK: Articles written by a US-based Armenian journalist suggest however, that there is a link between the promotion of a separate Yezidi identity and the amount of money made available to promote separate Yezidi newspapers and culture at a time when newspapers such as "Riya Taza" were facing financial difficulty. GA: Do you know what is amazing for me, and I wonder as an Armenian, is how you can explain the very focused interest of political and non- political non governmental organisations in the Yezidi problem in Armenia. All of them are trying to represent the 50,000 Yezidi as Kurds. What is the interest of these organisations?
OK: I do not believe that this is the interest of NGOs in the West. However, there are very obviously political groups in the west who see the Kurdish movement as a medium for whatever political interests, and the Yezidi are part of that political interest. However, the Yezidi can be seen to be an appropiate focus for any study of the situation of minorities within the Republic of Armenia, and that is why I am here, and why the issue of the Yezidi national and ethnic identity needs to be addressed. GA: Minorities within Armenia are living very well, and you can see that every minority, even the Yezidi, and even the Kurds, are living very well here.
OK: However, in last year's US State Department report on human rights practices in Armenia it did state that there were cases of discrimination against Yezidi. GA: There is not any discrimination against Yezidi. You know where this rumour comes from? It comes from Germany and other countries because some of those Yezidi that left Armenia for the west found that European governments did not want to give refugee status to these people. The only people that can get refugee status are those that have experienced political persecution, and so this allegation was made in order to get refugee status. Even Armenians. For example, I have some acquaintances here that disliked Dashnaktsutiune who came to me two years ago. This was during a very dark period of Levon Ter-Petrossian's regime two or three years ago when Dashnaktsutiune was banned. But they wanted to join Dashnaktsutiune so that they could get refugee status in the west, and this is the same problem with the Yezidi. I read a report in Belgium that suggested that every Yezidi in Armenia has undergone persecution for speaking Kurdish, and that even some of them were killed in the streets. We sent a Yezidi to the west to show the real situation of the Yezidi in Armenia. There is not any discrimination in Armenia. I know of course what the real reason is for the interest in the Yezidi.
OK: And what is that? GA: To include Armenia in the list of countries with a Kurdish problem. Having a Yezidi minority, Armenia can not be home to bases for the PKK, and a home for Kurdish guerillas. But if Armenia has a Kurdish minority, and it does not matter if they are only 50,000, then some of Armenia is part of Kurdistan, along with Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. This is very primitive and superficial. You can very easily detect the real reasons for the interest in the Armenian Yezidi. The [former] American Ambassador, Gilmore, on many occasions visited Yezidi villages. He wanted to insist on the Kurdish identity of the Yezidi. He even held a seminar on the Yezidi. It has a mostly political basis - nothing to do with human rights. There is even a speciality called "fact-finding". They teach people to identify human rights violations, but I can show you where human rights violations occur. Saudia Arabia for example - they cut off people's hands - and Africa, so its amazing. We are laughing at this attitude towards Armenia. Yezidi are citizens of Armenia, they are not Kurds, and you can visit Yezidi inhabited villages.
OK: How many [Moslem] Kurds are left in Armenia GA: About 100.
OK: 100 people? Someone told me around 2-5,000. Are they wrong? GA: They are quite wrong. That is the problem, Mr. Krikorian.
|
